Feds Nix Two Tribal Gaming Compacts, Gov. Gavin Newsom Protests

Feds Nix Two Tribal Gaming Compacts, Gov. Gavin Newsom Protests.

Costfoto / NurPhoto / Getty Images

Key Takeaways

The US Department of the Interior decided not to approve Class III gaming compacts with two California tribes — the Santa Rosa Indian Community of the Santa Rosa Rancheria and the Middletown Rancheria of Pomo Indians — claiming that they violated portions of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act.

Tachi Palace Casino ResortThe Tachi Palace Casino Resort in Lemoore, Calif, seen above. The federal government recently denied two compacts signed by the State of California, including one with the Santa Rosa Indian Community of the Santa Rosa Rancheria to expand their resort. (Image: tachipalace.com)

Both tribes were reportedly planning a “casino resort complex,” according to rejection letters sent to the tribes and the state. These plans include building new restaurants and hotels that operate beyond the gaming spaces regulated by the Tribe’s Gaming Commission.

Taking issue with several definitions in the compacts, the feds wrote, The 2022 compact confers expansive powers on the state and local governments to regulate the tribe’s activities and lands that are not directly related to the actual conduct of gaming.”

State-tribal Class III gaming compacts are agreements between the state and separate tribal governments that specify how many gaming devices and casinos a single tribe can operate, according to the Tribal Alliance of Sovereign Indian Nations.

The Santa Rosa Rancheria had planned to expand the gaming space in their Tachi Palace Casino Resort in Lemoore, Calif. by 44,000 square feet and build a 12-room hotel tower, a bingo hall/conference center, and a three-level garage.

Newsom Slams Decision

California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) strongly rebuked the feds’ decision, warning of its repercussions. He said in a statement that the disapprovals Threaten the ability of these and other tribes to invest and maintain jobs in many of California’s economically disadvantaged communities.

He noted that the compacts were “carefully negotiated by the state and the tribes in compliance with the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act” to give tribes the “economic benefits of gaming while mitigating impacts to local communities.” And he noted that this latest agreement came on top of existing compacts signed between the tribes and the state in 1999.

This is the second time the Interior Department has disapproved of compacts with the same tribes, following a similar decision in November 2021.

California has ratified gaming compacts with 75 tribes, and currently hosts 66 casinos operated by 63 tribes, according to the California Gambling Control Commission.

Article Sources
Patriots Favored to Repeat as Super Bowl Champions as NFL Playoffs Begin Saturday editorial policy.
  1. The 13 Hotel Misses Another Opening, Macau Regulators Say Property Remains Unlicensed

Compare Accounts
×
Caesars Entertainment Stock Trading Halted After Company Says Las Vegas Demand Softening
Provider
Name
Description
Connecticut Sports Betting Deadline Set By Governor Dannel Malloy, Legislature Has Until End of Week  Nevada Casinos Revenue Hits $933M in June, Industry Posts Fifth Consecutive Monthly Gain  DraftKings Sued Over Sports Betting National Championship Contest Tech Glitch  Virginia’s First Casino No Guarantee as Nansemond Tribe Challenges Pamunkey Ancestral Land Claim  New Delta Casino Approved in Vancouver Area, Neighboring Mayor Furious  Massachusetts Governor Charlie Baker, Three State Legislators File Dueling Sports Betting Bills  Tribe Buying Sands Bethlehem in Pennsylvania Planning $190M Expansion  Atlantic City Casinos Record Highest Win Since 2013, Statewide Gaming Revenue Totals $2.9B  Massachusetts Legislature Accidentally Outlaws Horse Racing, Plainridge Park, Suffolk Downs Suspend Operations  Bangladesh Bank Heist Case Still Wide Open, Says Philippine DOJ